Monday, January 25, 2010

On Dart League

So last fall, Raquel and I joined a local dart league at Willie’s – our favorite little haunt in CDA. It was kind of a nerve racking decision because we were going to devote 10 straight Sundays to playing 17 games of darts with some of Idaho’s finest. And I mean no disrespect by that – you just know who you are. We had always played darts recreationally while we were in Missouri, but we had never really thought of going pro until one of our coworkers approached Raquel about the idea.

The first day of dart league last fall was at a bar called Paddy’s and it was kind of a nerve wracking situation – just think bad blind date in a bar with NASCAR murals on the wall. I met my two partners – Rick and Vick – and, with a cursory glance to the others in the group, I honestly thought that this was a bad decision. I felt like we had nothing in common – the age gap was roughly 15 or so years between us all, a lot of them were married, had kids, had real world problems. Above all else, they were fucking great dart players.  So not only did I feel like I was going to be dead weight on my team, I had this nauseating fear that I was going to follow up my atrocious play by being the “silent-silent” partner that sits in the corner. (As an aside, for those of you who may not know me, when I get in uncomfortable group situations, I tend to clam up and migrate to the fringes of the group.)

As it turns out, when you get a group of people together who like to drink, you tend to find a lot of things in common with each other very quickly. That first night of darts went very well – I think I played well, but, regardless, I made friends with those around me.

This brings me to the point of all this – I think it’s a rare thing in today’s society for people to open themselves up to different groups of people. It may sound a little trite, but we have found ourselves in an age where we truly are defined by the things we own and our outward appearance. Everything we come in contact with is judged within a first, momentary glance. Just think – in the era of DVR and TiVO, we no longer have to sit through commercials or boring parts of television shows or the news in general. We can skip and jump to the bits and pieces of information that we want, right now. So when we see something in the real world that we dislike or does not fit our normal perception, we “fast forward” to the next thing – which, I’m not going to lie, I did when I first met a lot of the people in the dart league.

But, lo and behold, I look forward to Sunday night more than any other night of the week not only for the sheer enjoyment of playing darts, but to see everybody. I feel like dart league is a make-shift therapy group where you have a group of real world, middle to lower middle class, blue collar folk gathering to throw darts, drink some beer, talk a little shit to each other, and just forget about the normal everyday grind. You never know where you’ll find a group of people that helps you escape – so don’t just fast forward to the next thing each time you run into something uncomfortable (cheese ball moral, yes – but it’s true and understated).

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Corporate America is now all of America

Granted, I don’t watch enough news television as it stands, so I’m not sure just how much coverage the recent Supreme Court ruling has received. However, the fact that it’s not absolutely everywhere makes me believe that people are not taking it as seriously as they should. For those of you reading this who may not know what happened, the Supreme Court over turned the previous ruling that corporations could not back or fund candidates for the presidency. Now the most powerful candidate is going to be the one who can campaign to the most powerful companies in the nation – as opposed to campaigning to the people they are supposed to represent. It’s going to become, Wal-Mart presents the President of the United States of America!

I think what’s far scarier is the influence that foreign corporations have in our marketplace and how their agendas can be furthered through backing a specific candidate. Does this mean that companies can come together and front their own candidate? Is that really out of the realm of possibility? We saw in the Obama election that fundraising really help put him over the top against McCain. It allowed Obama to do things that McCain could not. With this in mind, you would think that if one company (say, Microsoft – not inflammatory, just example) wanted to put a candidate on the ticket – doesn’t said corporation’s deep pockets give their candidate an unfair advantage over traditional candidates?

I’m going to keep this short because I think that this can be extrapolated all the way to the apocalypse if we wanted to (and I’m sure several news outlets probably are). But, I’m going to stop off with two links. One is to a well written article on AlterNet.org and the second is a song that speaks very well to the situation.

When it comes to homework for the readers, I challenge someone to come up with a positive spin on this ruling. I’m grasping at straws trying to find them – and am completely open to any other opinions.